The book encompasses the breakdown of her first marriage and the beginning of her second, to a former addict who threatens her need for stability but to whom she nevertheless feels bound for life. In between are affairs with other men of varying duration, one of which results in the birth of her second child. She revisits an article she wrote in her 20s about her initiation into sex, at 15, by a rabbi more than twice her age. Actually, put your sweatshirt on. That will help.
Today in surprisingly useful objects: A little digital microscope
Scotland - Wikipedia
Do you have an old microscope, a limited budget, or possibly new research applications on the horizon? Perhaps you simply need to squeeze better performance out of your microscope for existing applications or wish to repurpose your system for a new research program? Here are five tips to extend the life of your microscope and push its performance further without breaking the bank:. This is often relatively easy and inexpensive. A qualified microscope service technician can clean your optics, apply fresh lubrication, and repair or replace broken components on-site. In severe cases, many service companies can perform a full microscope overhaul in their shop. New Olympus optics and many other components, for that matter are compatible with BX and IX microscopes dating back to the early s.
Add a Post
The laboratory activity is focused on archaeological research using radiocarbon. The overall approach used for radiocarbon dating is to first define as well as possible the context from which the samples are obtained, which involves extensive field work. The samples are then pre-screened for preservation and contamination, in order to identify those most suitable for dating.
National Science Foundation: Under the Microscope was a page report released on May 26, by US Senator Tom Coburn , a conservative Republican from Oklahoma , accusing the National Science Foundation of poor management and practices, criticizing various research projects, and in particular several in the social sciences. In , NSF replied to the report, saying that it "has been diligent about addressing concerns from members of Congress about workforce and grant management issues, and NSF's excellent record of tracking down waste and prosecuting wrongdoing is apparent" from the report itself, and that even some of the cases featured in the press release, like the inappropriate actions in the Antarctica facility, were internally reviewed and dealt with within the NSF. According to NSF, it is money obligated for multiyear grants. Controversy arose from the fact that the report highlighted many studies as pointless or wasteful, and made fun of them as "silly", or not "serious science". Several professional associations of academics, such as the American Political Science Association and the Association for Psychological Science criticized the report.